| | 
12-05-2004, 08:40 PM
| | | | Who is in Charge? Can whom ever is in charge of this NG. delete all the spam crap that is in
here...??
I have heard that some of the spam has a virus that creates more of it if
not removed from the system if a reader opens one
of the messages.
TIA
otb | 
12-05-2004, 08:40 PM
| | | | Re: Who is in Charge? Oak Tree Brewer wrote:[color=blue]
>
> Can whom ever is in charge of this NG. delete all the spam crap that is in
> here...??
>
> I have heard that some of the spam has a virus that creates more of it if
> not removed from the system if a reader opens one
> of the messages.[/color]
Uh, this is an unmoderated usenet group...nobody's "in charge". If
you're worried about viruses, use a newsreader that doesn't
automatically open attachments.
---------->Denny
--
Life begins at 60 - 1.060, that is. | 
12-05-2004, 08:40 PM
| | | | Re: Who is in Charge? or at least, set "tools -> options -> read -> all messages in plain text" if
you use Outlook (Express). That will protect you not only from any virus
attachment but also from nasty blinking html crap.
--
* [url]www.brauherr.de[/url]
* (wenn Bier für Sie nicht nur gelb ist und blau macht)
** Wer das bayerische "Reinheitsgebot" für eine deutsche Segnung hält,
** der sollte auch Michael Glos als Bundeskanzler wählen.
***None of those is translatable without loss.
***I regret, you shouldn't. | 
12-05-2004, 08:40 PM
| | | | Re: Who is in Charge? My concern was for those that are new and not knowledgably about what
problems that can be caused by even unintentional click on the post.
Thus my question on who monitors... usually the person that starts the group
is assigned the monitor
responsibility.. however this group has been around a while and thus they
are gone..
"fischherr" <ich_will_keinen_spam___i_do_not_want_spam@t-online.de> wrote in
message news:bdi9dp$sc1$03$1@news.t-online.com...[color=blue]
> or at least, set "tools -> options -> read -> all messages in plain text"[/color]
if[color=blue]
> you use Outlook (Express). That will protect you not only from any virus
> attachment but also from nasty blinking html crap.
>
> --
> * [url]www.brauherr.de[/url]
> * (wenn Bier für Sie nicht nur gelb ist und blau macht)
>
> ** Wer das bayerische "Reinheitsgebot" für eine deutsche Segnung hält,
> ** der sollte auch Michael Glos als Bundeskanzler wählen.
>
> ***None of those is translatable without loss.
> ***I regret, you shouldn't.
>
>[/color] | 
12-05-2004, 08:40 PM
| | | | Re: Who is in Charge? Relax. I have yet to see a virus in this type of a newsgroup.
Ray
"Oak Tree Brewer" <edterry zero one zero [email]one@hotmail.com[/email]> wrote in
message news:PM2La.36075$Bg.16908@rwcrnsc54...[color=blue]
> My concern was for those that are new and not knowledgably about what
> problems that can be caused by even unintentional click on the post.
> Thus my question on who monitors... usually the person that starts the[/color]
group[color=blue]
> is assigned the monitor
> responsibility.. however this group has been around a while and thus[/color]
they[color=blue]
> are gone..
>
>
> "fischherr" <ich_will_keinen_spam___i_do_not_want_spam@t-online.de>[/color]
wrote in[color=blue]
> message news:bdi9dp$sc1$03$1@news.t-online.com...[color=green]
> > or at least, set "tools -> options -> read -> all messages in plain[/color][/color]
text"[color=blue]
> if[color=green]
> > you use Outlook (Express). That will protect you not only from any[/color][/color]
virus[color=blue][color=green]
> > attachment but also from nasty blinking html crap.
> >
> > --
> > * [url]www.brauherr.de[/url]
> > * (wenn Bier für Sie nicht nur gelb ist und blau macht)
> >
> > ** Wer das bayerische "Reinheitsgebot" für eine deutsche Segnung[/color][/color]
hält,[color=blue][color=green]
> > ** der sollte auch Michael Glos als Bundeskanzler wählen.
> >
> > ***None of those is translatable without loss.
> > ***I regret, you shouldn't.
> >
> >[/color]
>
>[/color] | 
12-05-2004, 08:40 PM
| | | | Re: Who is in Charge? He/She/It is. | 
12-05-2004, 08:40 PM
| | | | Re: Who is in Charge? On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 21:35:43 GMT "Oak Tree Brewer" <edterry zero one
zero [email]one@hotmail.com[/email]> sputtered the following meaningless banter:
[color=blue]
> usually the person that starts the group
>is assigned the monitor[/color]
Wrong.
-Riggs | 
12-05-2004, 08:40 PM
| | | | Re: Who is in Charge?
"Riggs" <matt@meganandmatt.remove.com> wrote in message
news:ibtufvc3ncn7spvpmi3jin0ttt85h3c7l3@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 21:35:43 GMT "Oak Tree Brewer" <edterry zero one
> zero [email]one@hotmail.com[/email]> sputtered the following meaningless banter:
>[color=green]
> > usually the person that starts the group
> >is assigned the monitor[/color]
> Wrong.
>
>
> -Riggs
>[/color]
It depends upon the newsgroup charter ... assuming there is one. Some
groups can be moderated.
Tom Veldhouse | 
12-05-2004, 08:40 PM
| | | | Re: Who is in Charge? On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:27:39 -0500 "Thomas T. Veldhouse"
<veldy71@yahoo.com> sputtered the following meaningless banter:
[color=blue]
>
>"Riggs" <matt@meganandmatt.remove.com> wrote in message
>news:ibtufvc3ncn7spvpmi3jin0ttt85h3c7l3@4ax.com...[color=green]
>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 21:35:43 GMT "Oak Tree Brewer" <edterry zero one
>> zero [email]one@hotmail.com[/email]> sputtered the following meaningless banter:
>>[color=darkred]
>> > usually the person that starts the group
>> >is assigned the monitor[/color]
>> Wrong.
>>
>>
>> -Riggs
>>[/color]
>
>It depends upon the newsgroup charter ... assuming there is one. Some
>groups can be moderated.
>
>Tom Veldhouse
>[/color]
Then, MODERATED would be in the title. Show me the charter for this
group and I will say wrong again. That is if you can find one.
-Riggs | 
12-05-2004, 08:40 PM
| | | | Re: Who is in Charge?
"Riggs" <matt@meganandmatt.remove.com> wrote in message
news:egc8gv4g5lapjslc654qfhmvp0r5nquh38@4ax.com...[color=blue][color=green]
> >It depends upon the newsgroup charter ... assuming there is one. Some
> >groups can be moderated.
> >
> >Tom Veldhouse
> >[/color]
> Then, MODERATED would be in the title. Show me the charter for this
> group and I will say wrong again. That is if you can find one.
>
>
> -Riggs
>[/color]
Geeze, tone it down buddy, I wasn't disagreeing with you.
Tom Veldhouse | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 AM. |